<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why buy an unlocked device in 2009?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thoughtsons60.com/2008/10/26/why-buy-an-unlocked-device-in-2009/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thoughtsons60.com/2008/10/26/why-buy-an-unlocked-device-in-2009/</link>
	<description>reflections on the most popular mobile operating system worldwide</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 16:17:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Smoochy</title>
		<link>http://thoughtsons60.com/2008/10/26/why-buy-an-unlocked-device-in-2009/#comment-158</link>
		<dc:creator>Smoochy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 17:02:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thoughtsons60.wordpress.com/?p=134#comment-158</guid>
		<description>IamU stole my thunder. A branded phone is fine if you never leave home. I cross the globe monthly with layovers in places i can&#039;t even make calls but am able to use 3g for sms and internet. I would never ever consider a locked phone again even though i&#039;ve been with t-mobile since they were voicestream and some local company in socal. To me, a locked phone is a ball and chain that prevents me from traveling. 
Besides, when i&#039;m home in indonesia, it&#039;s nearly impossible to even find a locked phone. People change service providers like i change my mind and sim cards are about 1 dollar so locked phones would be useless.
Nice article by the way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IamU stole my thunder. A branded phone is fine if you never leave home. I cross the globe monthly with layovers in places i can&#8217;t even make calls but am able to use 3g for sms and internet. I would never ever consider a locked phone again even though i&#8217;ve been with t-mobile since they were voicestream and some local company in socal. To me, a locked phone is a ball and chain that prevents me from traveling.<br />
Besides, when i&#8217;m home in indonesia, it&#8217;s nearly impossible to even find a locked phone. People change service providers like i change my mind and sim cards are about 1 dollar so locked phones would be useless.<br />
Nice article by the way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ARJWright</title>
		<link>http://thoughtsons60.com/2008/10/26/why-buy-an-unlocked-device-in-2009/#comment-149</link>
		<dc:creator>ARJWright</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 03:37:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thoughtsons60.wordpress.com/?p=134#comment-149</guid>
		<description>Nice post. And from a lot of perspectives, its too spot on. Of course, you give the reasons for 2009 to actually be a banner year for unbranded (not unlocked ;) ) mobiles...

...the incentive for carriers to have the latest (relevant) tech at lower prices is indeed the reason for the dearth of models out now. Makes such as Nokia have had that position for a long time of being able to move past those strained carrier relationships, and create a market for their devices that are devoid of carrier banded effects. This was good for a time, but even as it did in the past, the battle ground is the same - innovation from manufacturers has to be hands, feet, and heads above what the carriers can do in order to get a look from a consumer, and (now) has to be at a more accessible price.

Given the time since the release of the N95, which one could say was a bit of a watershed moment for unbranded versus branded devices, one should see 2009 being a time when either carriers get the most innovative things ever, or manufacturers such as Samsung and Nokia take innovation into their own hands and literally jump again two years+ ahead of what the normal customer wants.

Such a move keeps the carrier in the front of the mind as an innovator, and in some respects, protects that profit area from those users who want the best years before carriers would be able to market that to their normal users.

Not saying that Nokia or others will, only that its possible for 2009. And I think, just given from hints around the mobile sphere, that it just might happen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice post. And from a lot of perspectives, its too spot on. Of course, you give the reasons for 2009 to actually be a banner year for unbranded (not unlocked <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  ) mobiles&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8230;the incentive for carriers to have the latest (relevant) tech at lower prices is indeed the reason for the dearth of models out now. Makes such as Nokia have had that position for a long time of being able to move past those strained carrier relationships, and create a market for their devices that are devoid of carrier banded effects. This was good for a time, but even as it did in the past, the battle ground is the same &#8211; innovation from manufacturers has to be hands, feet, and heads above what the carriers can do in order to get a look from a consumer, and (now) has to be at a more accessible price.</p>
<p>Given the time since the release of the N95, which one could say was a bit of a watershed moment for unbranded versus branded devices, one should see 2009 being a time when either carriers get the most innovative things ever, or manufacturers such as Samsung and Nokia take innovation into their own hands and literally jump again two years+ ahead of what the normal customer wants.</p>
<p>Such a move keeps the carrier in the front of the mind as an innovator, and in some respects, protects that profit area from those users who want the best years before carriers would be able to market that to their normal users.</p>
<p>Not saying that Nokia or others will, only that its possible for 2009. And I think, just given from hints around the mobile sphere, that it just might happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jslappa</title>
		<link>http://thoughtsons60.com/2008/10/26/why-buy-an-unlocked-device-in-2009/#comment-145</link>
		<dc:creator>Jslappa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Dec 2008 06:20:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thoughtsons60.wordpress.com/?p=134#comment-145</guid>
		<description>I enjoyed your blog post, Jonny. I think you have characterized the cell phone industry fairly accurately here. As the average consumer continues to demand more features, carriers will be virtually required to offer said features if they are to keep their current market share, much less take customers from rival carriers. This is precisely why Verizon has finally begun to loosen the reigns on GPS enabled phones in their lineup. As 2009 comes and goes, I think we will see more and more carriers offering devices without blocking WiFi, GPS and other tech. They&#039;ll simply require an all-you-can-eat buffet price to use those devices on their network. Sprint has started doing just that by forcing users into their higher-priced plans for certain phones. 

As for Motorolla, Nokia, Samsung, and the like, as long as shareholders demand lower production costs, R&amp;D will suffer, and new technology coming to the public will be stiffled. This is highlighted in your post with regards to Nokia, and their current offerings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I enjoyed your blog post, Jonny. I think you have characterized the cell phone industry fairly accurately here. As the average consumer continues to demand more features, carriers will be virtually required to offer said features if they are to keep their current market share, much less take customers from rival carriers. This is precisely why Verizon has finally begun to loosen the reigns on GPS enabled phones in their lineup. As 2009 comes and goes, I think we will see more and more carriers offering devices without blocking WiFi, GPS and other tech. They&#8217;ll simply require an all-you-can-eat buffet price to use those devices on their network. Sprint has started doing just that by forcing users into their higher-priced plans for certain phones. </p>
<p>As for Motorolla, Nokia, Samsung, and the like, as long as shareholders demand lower production costs, R&amp;D will suffer, and new technology coming to the public will be stiffled. This is highlighted in your post with regards to Nokia, and their current offerings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IamU</title>
		<link>http://thoughtsons60.com/2008/10/26/why-buy-an-unlocked-device-in-2009/#comment-142</link>
		<dc:creator>IamU</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 01:54:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thoughtsons60.wordpress.com/?p=134#comment-142</guid>
		<description>Personally I prefer an unlocked device because I travel, being locked into a particular carrier is just unacceptable.  But thats just me, if a person rarely goes overseas then theres no point in spending extra for the freedom.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally I prefer an unlocked device because I travel, being locked into a particular carrier is just unacceptable.  But thats just me, if a person rarely goes overseas then theres no point in spending extra for the freedom.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: newtype2011</title>
		<link>http://thoughtsons60.com/2008/10/26/why-buy-an-unlocked-device-in-2009/#comment-106</link>
		<dc:creator>newtype2011</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 01:34:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thoughtsons60.wordpress.com/?p=134#comment-106</guid>
		<description>Great article, and, as evident from the discussion on HoFo, I think many people share your malcontent with the current situation Nokia has found itself here in the States. Many of our next phones may be branded...and that may turn out to be okay.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article, and, as evident from the discussion on HoFo, I think many people share your malcontent with the current situation Nokia has found itself here in the States. Many of our next phones may be branded&#8230;and that may turn out to be okay.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donny aka prom1</title>
		<link>http://thoughtsons60.com/2008/10/26/why-buy-an-unlocked-device-in-2009/#comment-103</link>
		<dc:creator>Donny aka prom1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 01:54:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thoughtsons60.wordpress.com/?p=134#comment-103</guid>
		<description>Jonny interesting article. I had to make another rambling of my own ... if you have time please check it out.

http://seriousmobile.blogspot.com/2008/10/symbian-foundation-power-future-brings.html

I did link your site here as well. Hope you don&#039;t mind. If this isn&#039;t appropriate please let me know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jonny interesting article. I had to make another rambling of my own &#8230; if you have time please check it out.</p>
<p><a href="http://seriousmobile.blogspot.com/2008/10/symbian-foundation-power-future-brings.html" rel="nofollow">http://seriousmobile.blogspot.com/2008/10/symbian-foundation-power-future-brings.html</a></p>
<p>I did link your site here as well. Hope you don&#8217;t mind. If this isn&#8217;t appropriate please let me know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Where&#8217;s the Nokia buzz? &#171; obsidial &#124; blog</title>
		<link>http://thoughtsons60.com/2008/10/26/why-buy-an-unlocked-device-in-2009/#comment-102</link>
		<dc:creator>Where&#8217;s the Nokia buzz? &#171; obsidial &#124; blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 19:47:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thoughtsons60.wordpress.com/?p=134#comment-102</guid>
		<description>[...] and my thoughts on where Nokia/S60 should be headed. Note: I was also influenced by a post on another blog about this very same issue. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and my thoughts on where Nokia/S60 should be headed. Note: I was also influenced by a post on another blog about this very same issue. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JonnyBruha lays down the pipe on Nokia. &#124; %date% &#124; Phoneomenon.com</title>
		<link>http://thoughtsons60.com/2008/10/26/why-buy-an-unlocked-device-in-2009/#comment-100</link>
		<dc:creator>JonnyBruha lays down the pipe on Nokia. &#124; %date% &#124; Phoneomenon.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 17:01:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thoughtsons60.wordpress.com/?p=134#comment-100</guid>
		<description>[...] LINK [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] LINK [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AC</title>
		<link>http://thoughtsons60.com/2008/10/26/why-buy-an-unlocked-device-in-2009/#comment-98</link>
		<dc:creator>AC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 12:44:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thoughtsons60.wordpress.com/?p=134#comment-98</guid>
		<description>I actually enjoy owning an unlocked handset (currently an E71) and being somewhat of a &quot;mobile elitist&quot;. And the fact that Fido, my Canadian carrier has an absolutely awful lineup of handsets kind of forced the issue for me...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actually enjoy owning an unlocked handset (currently an E71) and being somewhat of a &#8220;mobile elitist&#8221;. And the fact that Fido, my Canadian carrier has an absolutely awful lineup of handsets kind of forced the issue for me&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
